Discuss the significance of the service in terms of its health, economic and social impact by providing critical analysis of research.

This assignment is intended to assess the following learning outcomes:

  1. a) Explain the use of descriptive and inferential statistics in the design and interpretation of health and healthcare research, and in service improvement.
  2. b) Identify the nature and sources of information and data needed to write a research proposal and report using appropriate research process criteria
  3. c) Plan a research project appropriate to a field of study
  4. d) Select and implement appropriate analytical techniques
  5. e) Constructively critique the research of others, identifying strengths and weaknesses in technique, analysis and conclusions.
  6. f) Evaluate an existing healthcare or service programme

Details of the task In your report and plan you will be expected to:

1) Select a health outcome relevant to your programme (Health Service Management) and critically evaluate research studies relating to a service designed to improve this health outcome.

2) Your critical evaluation should include discussion of the creation, expansion, contracture or closure of the service.

3) Discuss the significance of the service in terms of its health, economic and social impact by providing critical analysis of research.

4) Describe populations (geographically, socially, economically, etc) that may benefit most from this service (please make reference to specific research evidence to support the information presented).

5) Identify research priorities relating to this service. i.e. Is further research/evaluation required?

6) Provide a plan to describe how research/evaluation may provide more information about the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of this service

Prepare a strategic commissioning intentions plan for 2016 to 2018 for the London Borough of Southwark including priorities, target populations, intended outcomes and funding allocations.

Plan Objective: Prepare a strategic commissioning intentions plan for 2016 to 2018 for the London Borough of Southwark including priorities, target populations, intended outcomes and funding allocations.

MODULE AIMS
The module aims to:
• The module will enable students to explore a range of current approaches to strategic commissioning within the health care environment
Main topics of study:
• Use of JSNAs and HNAs to assess current and future trends and the demand for health and social care
• Developing the strategic approach to addressing health needs in a locality.
• Developing commissioning intentions and plans
• Creation and management of Strategic Partnerships
• Methods to monitor process variation in healthcare
• Commissioning frameworks – Acute, Primary and tertiary care
• Strategic fit with local and national policy and commissioning priorities
• Critical evaluation of commissioning plans
MODULE LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of this Module, students will be able to:
Knowledge
1. Identify and select sources of information and data needed to write a commissioning strategic plan.
2. Select and implement appropriate analytical techniques in strategy and commissioning
Subject-based practical skills
3. Select appropriate approaches to developing a commissioning strategic plan
Thinking skills
4. Explore aspects of the commissioning process for healthcare in a locality
5. Critique commissioning intentions, identifying strengths and weaknesses in process and outcome measures.
Skills for life and work (general skills)
6. Prepare a strategic plan for the commissioning of services in a locality with a high Index of Multiple Deprivation.

How might the success of what you proposed be judged i,e,how to assess health improvements. Use the health domain structure in the Health Outcomes to think about your work.

  • What they’re doing.
  • What they are going to do.
  • And there plans for the future.

The second assessment expects you to use what you have researched and done in your community placement( NEWHAM FOREST GATE) and to place this in a policy context i.e. explain about the new public health structure and how it helps achieve better public health using what you have been doing to illustrate this,. You will be expected to show the relevance of the work that you did. Here you will need to show the context of the work that you did using local data i.e. how relevant was the topic that you worked on. Most worked in the local neighbourhood centres so here local health profile data is relevant. A few teams worked at borough level and so a broader picture is needed. How might your work – if continue – improve the health of local people?

  • Public Health Observatories – Search Results
  • Hub Data from 2014 – with borough comparison
  • Public Health Observatories – Training Video or just go to local health profiles below
  • Public Health Profiles at borough level
  • Plaistow Community Neighbourhood – not just Plaistow
  • You have access to the first few report – useful
  • Local Health Profiles – search on Newham and select your area

For the final link above you must be using a PC and microsoft OS

You will also be expected to review and evaluate the “new” public health framework. For example does the “new” public health policy and structure allow a better understanding of local health needs? Is public health now better able to help local health needs? You will have talked to health leaders, centre managers, community representatives, Healthwatch, civic leaders and (perhaps even a local health champion) about the health needs of the area in which you were based (or for some team the topic that you investigate). You can include this local research. This assessment allows you to review your placement work and requires you to place your work in a policy framework e.g. reviewing and evaluating the “new” public health role of local councils.

How might the success of what you proposed be judged i,e,how to assess health improvements. Use the health domain structure in the Health Outcomes to think about your work.

Mention also the “Joint Strategic Needs Assessment” (JSNA). Use relevant aspects of JSNA in your answer.

Extra material can be placed in appendixes and referred to in your assessment answer.

Discuss your findings from the evidence gathered. Limitations can encompass: Many studies measured multiple outcomes

DISCUSSION

– Discuss your findings from the evidence gathered. Limitations can encompass: Many studies measured multiple outcomes

– Although all reported positive changes, there may be type I error.

– Student self-reports were more likely to change than other outcome measures.

– Was this particularly true for studies without active control?

– Variable delivery length and expertise

– Group level effects and

Publication bias.

– Make a conclusion based on your findings.

– What is the overall answer to the question? What did your review show?

– Consider the strength (both numerical and methodological) of the evidence

– Consider limitations, including publication and related biases

Consider implications for theory/practice and for future research