ANALYZE THE ROLE OF U.S. PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES IN THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY

ANALYZE THE ROLE OF U.S. PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES IN THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY

Discussion 8 The High Cost of Medications and Shortage of Health Professionals Please respond to the following:Analyze the role of U.S. pharmaceutical companies in the health care industry, and give your opinion on whether or not you believe the protocols used in their business transactions falls under ethical / moral considerations. Defend or critique the pharmaceutical industrys use of direct to consumer (DTC) ads in order to advertise its business. Provide a rationale for your responseInterpret the reason behind the perceived shortage of physicians in the U.S. highlighted in the text. Debate whether or not hospitals should hire more trained nurses to relieve the burden posed by the shortage of physicians.Compare the primary roles that health administrators play in a public setting versus a private setting. Critique or defend the quality of health care that patients receive through public versus private health services.ANALYZE THE ROLE OF U.S. PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES IN THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY

THE LONG-TERM HEALTH AND WELLBEING OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

THE LONG-TERM HEALTH AND WELLBEING OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Saving Our Fiscal ShipI have created a long and complex assignment that puts you in charge of attending to the long-term health and wellbeing of the United States of America (!). Utilizing a simulation created for the Brookings Institution called The Fiscal Ship you will learn about the relationships that exist between federal decision-makers and the myriad policy decisions they make. Given the dire condition of the federal debt and ongoing levels of deficit spending you are tasked with no less than saving the country by mid-century!(Spend a few minutes examining the federal debt by clicking on this link:http://www.usdebtclock.org/(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.)(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.BackgroundThe interplay of governing institutions and the making of public policy is at the heart of what we study in Module 2. As we will see typically what we know about politics and policymaking is pretty far removed from the actual practices of politics. Separation of powers with checks and balances produces the executive legislative and judicial branches of government; while it does not create coequal branches of government it does prevent any one branch from dominating the others. These governing institutions are inherently political. They produce policies that allocate relative advantage and disadvantage meaning that there are winners and losers with every decision government makes. It makes sense then that there are forces pressuring these institutions to maximize advantages or to minimize disadvantages.Americans are raised with a naive kind of assumption that government should do whats best for the people a notion that ignores the role of political parties interest groups powerful stakeholders and ideological preferences in the policymaking processes. It is true that the American political system works more effectively when bipartisan compromises can be reached. This is so because a sizable portion of the governed feels better represented when such compromises are made. However todays political environment offers few opportunities for bipartisan responses to important public policy priorities. The political divide in Washington DC is wider today than at any other time in the modern era.For decision makers the tool by which they shape policy outcomes is the federal budget. In general the president of the United States proposes a budget. This proposal pays homage to the promises made on the campaign trail and is broadly reflective of the preferences he or she brings to office. In general the Congress disregards this proposal and offers up its own preferences for federal spending. Congressional proposals are shaped by the preferences that dominate the House and the Senate. Every federal agency weighs in on proposals to increase or cut budgets as do interest groups and individuals attached to the spending proposals. Passing a federal budget is a long complex and heavily negotiated process but there is little regard to its impact on short-term deficits and the long-term debt.The impact of public policy decisions and non-decisions can be felt in the general health of the economy trade relations international relations defense arrangements social wellbeing and much much more.About the GameThe Fiscal Ship (http://fiscalship.org/(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.) challenges you to put the federal budget on a sustainable course. Measured as a share of gross domestic product the federal debt is higher than at any time since the end of World War II and projected to climb to unprecedented levels. America is looking at a permanent growing mismatch between revenues and spending and policymakers are faced with difficult decisions about how to reconcile important government prioritiesincluding retirement and health benefits promised to the growing number of old folkswith the tax revenues that the current tax code will yield. Todays tax code wont yield enough revenue to pay for basic services of government plus the retirement and health benefits promised to the growing number of old folks. So your mission is to pick from a menu of tax and spending options to reduce the debt from projected levels over the next 25 years. Small changes to spending and taxes wont suffice. The choices are difficult but the goal is achievable.But budget decisions arent only about fiscal sustainability. They also shape the kind of country we live in. To win the game you need to find a combination of policies that match your values and priorities AND set the budget on a sustainable course.Inside the Game you will find the categories in which most significant public policies can be organized:According to the Game the goals of public policies include:Fight Climate ChangeRein in EntitlementsShrink GovernmentTax CutterFiscal HawkProtect the ElderlyInvest in the FutureReduce inequalityStrengthen National DefenseStrengthen Social Safety NetInstructionsFor purposes of this assignment you are to run the simulation three separate times so that you can observe the outcomes through the lenses of the three broad policy preferences provided in the game. They are:The centrists: strengthen national defense invest in the future rein in entitlementsThe conservatives: rein in entitlements shrink government tax cutterThe progressives: reduce inequality invest in the future strengthen the social safety netUse these policy preferences to make budgetary decisions. For example make your first run centrist where your three goals are to strengthen national defense invest in the future and rein in entitlements. Make your second run conservative and your goals rein in entitlements shrink government and tax cutter. Finally for your third run choose the progressive goals to reduce inequality invest in the future and strengthen the social safety net. Each time you run the simulation look for changes in the budget projections. You will notice these as you tinker with policy decisions.To complete this assignment prepare an essay in which you respond to each of the prompts listed below. I recommend answering each prompt in its own paragraph. This structure provides you with a 6-paragraph format in which you can meet or exceed the minimum word count requirement.You will prepare a 540 word (minimum) essay in which you respond to the prompts listed above. Your response must be written in academic English. You will use your own voice and write in your own wordsno quotes or paraphrases allowed.To earn full points you must follow all instructions carefully proofread for writing errors and submit on time.PSFor specific reference purposes considering reviewing the information in the American Government textbook found on these pages:

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE HEALTH AND DISEASE IN DEVELOPED INTERNATIONAL COUNTRIES

FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE HEALTH AND DISEASE IN DEVELOPED INTERNATIONAL COUNTRIES

**This is for a Masters Degree class**Public Health TimelineSummarize the significance of both historical and current factors that influence health and disease in developed international countries and/or developing third world countries by creating a timeline that identifies the critical economic socio-political and cultural events that have shaped that countrys current health and disease status. Select onedevelopedand onedevelopingcountry of your choice and plan to go back100 yearsto the present.You may select the format of your timeline (ppt pdf doc etc) however it must be agraphical representationthat displays each critical event provides a short description of the event and is presented in chronological order.The purpose of this assignment is to comprehend the significance of the historical and current factors in proving how economic sociopolitical and cultural factors enhance or interfere with maintaining health of the global communities; you will also learn to differentiate how these factors are different among developed and underdeveloped global countries.FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE HEALTH AND DISEASE IN DEVELOPED INTERNATIONAL COUNTRIES

Program Evaluation as a Key Tool in Health and Human Services 

Program Evaluation as a Key Tool in Health and Human Services

Evidence-based practice utilizes a variety of research methods  to gather evidence as to the efficacy of a program’s effectiveness, or  cost effectiveness. According to your text, “Sound research and its  applications, although not guarantees of perfect policies and programs,  are extremely useful tools in developing sound social policies and  programs” (p. 281). Additionally, we read that evaluation research is  different from “basic” research in that evaluation research is based on  reality factors in the field and can answer the question: Is this  program achieving its goals within the cost estimates?

In  this assignment, you will create a fictional “how to” guide in  which you will analyze the steps pertinent to effective program  assessment. Specifically, you will:

Explain the parts of the program evaluation, and how one would carry out a program evaluation.
Explain the steps of the program evaluation and what the program evaluator would want to measure / evaluate.

Your fictional “how to” guide is intended to provide a  step-by-step explanation of the components related to evaluating  programs; you will not be conducting an assessment as part of the  assignment. An example of a program evaluation and the research format  is given in the Evaluation Strategies for Human Service Programs (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..   Your example can be any of the typical health and services areas  including: hospitals, nursing homes, clinic for substance abuse,  counseling clinics, Salvation Army, Red Cross, homes for the homeless,  special school programs, crisis centers and social support. Program  evaluation can include a variety of different research approaches and  may also include acquiring a great deal of data.  As you read the  article Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A Self-Study Guide (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.,  keep in mind the information requirements to carry out a program  evaluation. Certainly the connections among program outcomes, the  activities of the program, and consequential outcomes constitute the key  model of any program evaluation. Access the  Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A Self-Study Guide  (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for more information for this assignment.