.Explain the role that the WHO plays in the prevention of communicable diseases

Primary Task Response:Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.As a health care professional for an international health care network, you plan to visit 7 foreign countries this year as part of a communicable disease prevention program. Before you travel, you need to provide information to your assistants about the health care services in the countries you will be visiting, as well as on the World Health Organization (WHO), the agency that is concerned with international public health.Research using the Library and other resources to address the following:Provide examples that show how the WHO is involved with global health care assistance.Explain the role that the WHO plays in the prevention of communicable diseases.Select 7 foreign countries, and briefly describe the communicable disease situation in the selected countries. Include your statistics in a table format.What are the possible sources of financing for programs like the one in which you are involved?Be sure to support your information by citing at least 2 scholarly references using APA format.

How HIV and AIDS Education may Influence young Adults to change their life style in Nakuru Kenya?

Question 1. 350 words Discussion: Understanding Systematic Reviews Research topic: How HIV and AIDS Education may Influence young Adults to change their life style in Nakuru Kenya? Systematic review has been used to combine research related to public health. Reviewing a published systematic review will assist you in understanding the use of this study design. Use any university’s library and Academic Search Premier and the search terms “systematic review” and “public health” to identify published studies. Limit the search to articles published in the last year. Then introduce another broad search term based on your interests. From the final list of articles, select one to use for this discussion. You must use a true quantitative or qualitative systematic review for this discussion and your Week 1 assignment. Your chosen published systematic review will be used multiple times during this course. Read the article and post narrative responses to the following questions: 1. How were the included articles identified? Do you agree? 2. What criteria, if any, was used to exclude articles? Why? 3. Were included studies qualitative, quantitative, or both? 4. How does the methodology of the included studies affect the systematic review? 5. Was a systematic review appropriate in this situation? Why or why not? 6. How might the results influence public health? Question 2. 350 words Week 1 – Discussion: Topic Selection Post Discussion: Topic Selection 1. What topic have you selected? 2. How did you select this topic? 3. What problem will you address with your research? 4. What research questions relate to your problem? 5. Will you be able to use a systematic review to contribute to the body of knowledge on your topic? Why or why not? References Bui, Y. (2014).How to write a master’s thesis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Bolland, A., Cherry, G., & Dickson, R. (Eds.) (2014).Doing a systematic review; a student’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Safe Publications Question 3. Assignment: Systematic Review Checklist Submit Assignment: Systematic Review Checklist This week, you have been learning about systematic reviews and have been asked to identify your topic, research question(s), and hypotheses. A thorough review of already published systematic reviews can provide you with ideas and examples that you can use in your research. Using the published quantitative or qualitative systematic review article you chose for this week’s discussion, complete the Systematic Review Checklist

Discuss cultural beliefs and influences relative to the health issue

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
In your Collaborative Learning Community, write a paper of 500-1,000 words and include the following:

Discuss cultural beliefs and influences relative to the health issue.
Differentiate any religious/spiritual beliefs and values relative to the issue.
Appraise how religious/spiritual beliefs and values have influenced progress in addressing the issue–either negatively or positively.
Compare differences in ideologies related to the issue across political party lines, geographic regions, and countries of the world.

This is  APA format aqt least 500 word, references. I have added all the topics that have been added so far, I have topics 1-4 added. the one that will worked on is Topic 5

Topic 1
Influenza CLC group essay
Introduction
Influenza commonly known as flu is a contagious respiratory infection that attacks the general respiratory system that is, the nose, throat, and even the lungs. It is caused by the two types of influenza viruses which are influenza A, influenza B and influenza C (Wang & Tao, 2010). Attacks from both viruses are epidemic and seasonal as they are common within specific periods within a year. Attack mechanisms for influenza A viruses depends on the genes on the surface protein of a patient. They are normally spread through sneezing and coughing from an infected individual to the surrounding air (Wang & Tao, 2010).
The flu can also attack an individual in case they get into direct body tissue contact with an infected individual for example handshaking. Health professionals argue that the flu virus is stubborn and spreads mainly over tiny droplets which are produced when the infected individuals’ cough, talk, and sneeze (Wang & Tao, 2010). Such droplets are easily carried by the surrounding air and can be landed in the nose and mouths of the immediate persons. Additionally, it can enter into one’s system if he or she gets into direct contact with a surface or object that has the influenza bacteria and consequently rubs or touches their nose, mouth or even eyes (Wang & Tao, 2010).
Health departments have overtime identified initiative to address the problem of influenza, such initiatives include:
Reducing human exposure to the flu viruses, this initiative works by notifying the public on the safe ways to prevent and control the spread of the virus and it actively works to reduce infection opportunities and curbs the spread of the pandemic virus (Abramson, 2011).
They have built able capacities to cope with the pandemic, measures have been taken and put in place to cope with the virus since helping the society to stay free from the virus (Abramson, 2011).
They have innovated much on early warning and acknowledgments, information about influenza and its impacts to the society are made clear since it is effective for the society to stay free from the influenza virus (Abramson, 2011).
Necessary global scientific researches are being carried out and developments to ensure that vaccines and antiviral drugs are available across the globe mostly during the seasons which the virus is spread. The scientific knowledge enables quick and effective identification of the virus at its initial stages (Abramson, 2011).
Several measures have been put in place to measure the progress of the issue. They include;

When the side effects and long-term effects of a potential preventive measure are largely unknown, is it ethical to expose participants to these risks?

Ethics in Epidemiological Research (PUBLIC HEALTH)
An Experimental Study in the Primary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes
Imagine that researchers are conducting a randomized controlled trial of a high-fiber supplement as a preventive measure in persons at increased risk of type 2 diabetes. People enrolled in the study are disease-free at the time they agree to participate in the trial, but they all have a family history of type 2 diabetes and are considered at high-risk (80{0e601fc7fe3603dc36f9ca2f49ef4cd268b5950ef1bbcf1f795cc00e94cdd119}) to develop the disease during their lifetime. The 10,000 participants who start the trial are healthy individuals who are randomly allocated to receive either high-fiber supplements or placebo for several years. As you can imagine, this study will be quite expensive and will require a large infrastructure of personnel and materials to carry it out successfully.
Because type 2 diabetes has reached epidemic proportions in the United States, the potential benefits of this research are important at a population level. Unfortunately, high-fiber supplements have also been shown in a few studies to be associated with gastrointestinal blockage (which can be life-threatening) and reduced nutrient absorption, which may lead to anemia, osteoporosis, and other debilitating chronic diseases. The supplements may also reduce absorption of certain medications and cause gastrointestinal distress. The potential side effects of continuous high-fiber supplementation are only partially understood, and long-term effects are unknown.
Post your initial response to at least two of the following questions: 1 PAGE
1. What are the potential risks and benefits to be considered when designing this study?
2. When the side effects and long-term effects of a potential preventive measure are largely unknown, is it ethical to expose participants to these risks? Why or why not?
3. Is it ethical to deny the possible prevention benefits of high-fiber supplements to persons in the placebo group? Why or why not?
4. Do the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks to the participants and to society? Why or why not?