Explain the barriers to implementing policy analysis process and how they could be overcome

The purpose of the final project is to engage you in writing a health policy analysis. There are five steps in the health policy analysis process. Using South University Online Library or the Internet, research on a sexually transmitted disease (STD) policy of the state of Minnesota. Once you identify an STD policy from the state of Minnesota, visit your state health department or browse your state’s website and search for the STD policy you selected. Next, write a research paper describing this public health policy analysis and background. The final paper should include the following: • A title page • An introduction of policy analysis in two to three paragraphs discussing the following: o Overview o Purpose • A body o Health policy background (one page):  The state’s role in the policy-making process  The purpose of public health policy o Public health policy analysis five-step process discussing the following:  A problem statement (in the form of a question) (two paragraphs)  Background of a policy analysis provides factual information needed to understand the problem. Include economic issues of policy as well as regulatory policy (two pages).  The landscape section of a policy analysis identifies key stakeholders and describes the factors that are needed to analyze the problem. Write the landscape section on policy analysis. Include balance of patient rights versus protecting the population. Include any influence from government insurance programs. Your response should be of at least three pages.  Options (three or four) to address the policy problem. Your response should be of at least three pages.  Recommendations section should clearly identify three options. Which of the three options is favored and why is it is preferred over the other ones. Your response should be of at least one page. • A conclusion o Your conclusion (one page) should address the following main points:  Your recommendation and the reasoning behind it.  Summarize your findings.  Explain the barriers to implementing policy analysis process and how they could be overcome. Your paper should be a minimum of 12- to 13-pages in a Microsoft Word document. You need a minimum of six scholarly sources for both in-text citations and citations on the reference page. Support your responses with reasoning and examples. Cite any sources in APA format.

Locate two scholarly articles, each of which provides a description of an effective health advocacy campaign that addresses your issue

Application: Part 1 – Developing an Advocacy Campaign The following application (Part 1) will be due in week 4. To prepare: Select a population health issue of interest to you and identify the population affected by the issue. Locate two scholarly articles, each of which provides a description of an effective health advocacy campaign that addresses your issue. The articles need to focus on two different advocacy campaigns. Analyze the attributes of the two campaigns to determine what made them effective. Reflect on a policy you could propose or suggest a change to a current policy to improve the health of the population you selected. Consider how you could develop an advocacy campaign, applying the attributes identified in similar, effective campaigns. To complete: For the Part 1 application (approximately 3–4 pages of content with a title page and references in APA format) address the following: Describe your selected population health issue and the population affected by this issue. Summarize the two advocacy campaigns you researched in this area. Explain the attributes that made those campaigns effective. Begin to develop a plan for a health advocacy campaign that seeks to create a new policy or change an existing policy with regard to the issue and population you selected. Be sure to include in your plan: A description of the public health issue and proposed policy solution Specific objectives for the policy you want to be implemented Begin to substantiate of your proposed campaign by data and evidence. Be sure to paste the rubric at the end of your paper. By Day 7 of Week 4 This Assignment is due. Submission and Grading Information To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment. Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database. Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Discuss your thoughts on the concept of corporate environmental responsibility

You must also use one outside source. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. Question 3 Discuss your thoughts on the concept of corporate environmental responsibility. What should businesses be expected to do to minimize damage to public health and the environment? Do you think businesses can be trusted to be good public citizens, or is a command and control based regulatory approach necessary? Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. Question 4 Compare and contrast command and control against incentive-based regulatory philosophy. How would the corporate ethics of a company that would be better regulated under a command and control differ from those of a company that would be more effectively regulated by an incentive-based approach? Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.

What is the TRI and what are its main drawbacks

Question 1 What is the TRI and what are its main drawbacks? How do you think those drawbacks could be addressed? Your response should be at least 150 words in length. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. Question 2 What is legacy pollution? Choose one of the examples of poor environmental management from the text (beginning on p. 488). For your chosen example, discuss your thoughts on who should have exercised more responsible care in the situation. Would stricter regulation have helped in your example? Your response should be at least 150 words in length. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. Question 2 Discuss the basic elements of a professional code of ethics. Compare these elements to the code of ethics for your employer or current profession. What elements would you add, and why? (If you do not currently have an employer, research a code for the profession or employer you wish to have. If your current employer/profession does not have a code of ethics, research one for a similar field or employer.) Your response should be at least 200 words in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. You must also use one outside source. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.