Describe how Gastrodiplomacy might help countries like Thailand, Korea

150 points

 

Describe how Gastrodiplomacy might help countries like Thailand, Korea,

3-4 pages typed, double spaced, 12 pt. font, and proper spelling/grammar.Plagiarism will immediately be reported and result in an E grade for the course.

Hard copy to be turned in on the last day of class.

20 pts
Describe how Gastrodiplomacy might help countries like Thailand, Korea, India, China, the U.S. and others strategically help trade, foreign relations, and human rights advance globally. 20 Pts
Explain how you are participating in Gastrodiplomacy through weekly food selection.  Examples could include but aren’t limited to – types of foods you purchase and eat, restaurants you patronize, cookbooks you purchase, food blogs you subscribe to, and ingredients you select. Thoroughly describe at least 3 ways you participate in Gastrodiplomacy. 30pts
Describe how this class (lecture or lab) has increased your understanding of at least 3 specific aspects of food culture.  Describe the importance and significance of these things within their specific region or within your own day to day life. 30 pts
Explain how NUTR 3620 has increased your understanding of global issues as well as your understanding of individuals within those cultures. 30 pts
Total 150 pts

 

Read the following article to get a clearer understanding of gastrodiplomacy. The link is posted along with the actual article.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-rockower/the-gastrodiplomacy-cookb_b_716555.htm

 

Paul Rockower

Gastronomist

The Gastrodiplomacy Cookbook

“Food is our common ground, a universal experience.” — James Beard

 

One of the more delicious forms of public diplomacy has recently emerged in the global consciousness: gastrodiplomacy. Public diplomacy is a field predicated on the communication of culture and values to foreign publics; gastrodiplomacy, most plainly put, is the act of winning hearts and minds through stomachs. It is a public and cultural diplomacy endeavor that the governments of Korea and Taiwan have recently embarked on. There is an old American public diplomacy maxim, “to know us is to love us;” Taiwanese and Korean gastrodiplomacy posits it a little differently and declares “to taste us is to love us.”

 

Gastrodiplomacy was a technique perfected by Thailand, which first used its kitchens and restaurants as outposts of cultural diplomacy. Given the growing popularity of Thai restaurants around the globe, in 2002, the government of Thailand implemented the “Global Thai program” as a means to increase the number of Thai restaurants. The Thai government’s rationale, The Economist noted, was that the boom in restaurants, “will not only introduce delicious spicy Thai food to thousands of new tummies and persuade more people to visit Thailand, but it could subtly help deepen relations with other countries.”

 

More recently, both Korea (“Kimchi Diplomacy”) and Taiwan (“Dim Sum Diplomacy”) have been engaging in culinary diplomacy to help increase global recognition of their respective nation brands.

 

Seoul initiated the “Korean Cuisine to the World” campaign in April 2009, with stated goals of increasing Korean restaurants abroad fourfold to nearly 40,000 by 2017. The ₩50 billion (US$40 million) fund will be used to promote Korean cooking classes an internationally-acclaimed cooking schools, help support Korean culinary students with grants and scholarships to attend culinary schools and international food fairs. Korean cuisine also got added attention with the local Los Angeles creation of the Korean-taco truck, which quickly gained a culinary cult status and has been popping up all over America.

 

Meanwhile, Taipei recently unveiled a plan to promote Taiwanese culinary diplomacy. The sad culinary reality is that most people associate Chinese food with the heavy, sauce-laden fare that is promoted as typical Middle Kingdom cuisine; meanwhile, for those not of the foodie bent, the notion of Taiwanese cuisine draws a blank. That creates a tremendous opportunity for Taiwan to conduct gastrodiplomacy in order to brand its own cuisine as a healthy, light alternative to the heavy image associated with Western versions of Chinese food. The lighter, healthier side of Taiwanese cuisine, with its unique flavors and textures could really tempt global tummies as it creates awareness of what Taiwanese food entails.

 

Through the Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan is set to invest NT$1.1 billion (US$34.2 million) through 2013 to engage in Taiwanese gastrodiplomacy and promote Taiwanese cuisine at the global dining table. As part of the campaign, Taiwan will host international gourmet festivals as well as help send local chefs to ply their culinary skills at global culinary competitions. The initiative will support the introduction of Taiwanese restaurants abroad, with a focus on major overseas shopping malls and department stores as well as sampling stations for Taiwanese cuisines at international airports. Moreover, the gastrodiplomacy plan is anticipated to enable local businesses to set up 3,500 restaurants in both Taiwan and abroad, and generate close to NT$2 billion in private investments.

Discuss benefits of and barriers to implementation of EHR

Continue to utilize this scenario to assist you with your plan completion

“The benefits of EHR implementation are numerous; however, there can be significant barriers to their acquisition and use. Discuss benefits of and barriers to implementation of EHR this week, and please use the following scenario to assist you with this week’s assignment:

Yorkshire Clinic is an acute care clinic located in Tacoma, Washington. The clinic is comprised of a group of 10 physicians, 2 physician assistants, 1 nurse practitioner, and several ancillary staff. Yorkshire Clinic serves a patient population of approximately 14,000. ”

Now that you have selected a vendor to supply electronic health record (EHR) capabilities to the clinic, you must submit a request for proposal (RFP). The RFP is a valuable tool that is used to provide detailed requirements to potential vendors and gives guidelines to those vendors to follow during the bidding contract. The RFP might request that the vendor provide the following (Wager, Lee, & Glaser, 2005):

  • Vendor qualifications: General background of vendor, experience, number of installations, financial stability, and so forth
  • Proposed solutions: How the vendor believes its product meets organizational goals
  • General contractual requirements: Warranties, payment schedule, penalties for failure to meet schedule specified in the contract, and so forth
  • Pricing and support: Quote on cost of system, utilization of standardized forms, and so forth

The RFP that you construct should list numerous items that Yorkshire Clinic requires, such as the following:

  • Information about the clinic
  • What functionality is desired
  • Product description

Utilize the format provided in the following Web site to assist you in your proposal:http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_047959.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_047959

how the invention of household appliances created social change

Technology – a catalyst for social change

Over the next few weeks we examine the subject of technology and how it can be taught within a primary school context. Let’s first consider the broader concept of technology and why it is such an important part of our past, present and future lives.

The story of technology is the continual invention of new objects and materials in order to create solutions to our most basic problems. Flint stone knives were made to help us cut, while the wheel helped us transport heavy loads. Our ability to create and perfect the use of tools has been an integral part of human history for thousands of years. The list of historical changing technological inventions is extensive, including: the printing press, the combustion engine, and the silicon chip, to name but a few. Each wave of major technological change has become a catalyst for significant social change.

To see the impact of technological change on a familiar context, take a look at the The History of Household Technology (LibraryOfCongress, 2009) summarising how technology has changed domestic life over last 150 years.

As you watch the video, consider:

  • how the invention of household appliances created social change
  • why these inventions were solutions to social problems.

The introduction of new technology creates new opportunities and ways of thinking that are sometimes difficult to see beforehand. In our lifetime we have witnessed massive technological change through the exponential growth of the Internet and mobile communication. These have produced a new wave of social change that has led to the creation of new ways that we live and work.

Do you consciously avoid having important conversations in high traffic public areas where environmental distractions are likely possible?

Self-assessment of Communication Skills

 

In this assignment, you will develop an understanding of how good listening is crucial to effective communication and career success. In addition, you will perform a personal assessment of your communication skills and style.

Listening is an integral part of the communication process. Communication in the healthcare setting is vital. This includes communication between doctors and patients, doctors and nurses, clinicians and administrators, and so on.

 

Based on your learning, create a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document that includes answers to the following questions:

 

  • Which topic of conversation makes you uncomfortable? What is the topic? Do you know why you find it difficult to talk about this topic?

 

  • What do you do when you become uncomfortable during a conversation? Do you withdraw? Do you try to change the topic? Do you speak louder or softer? Do you begin to gesticulate?

 

 

  • Have you had an occasion to talk to a very persuasive or very aggressive person? If you and this person hold different opinions, can you hold to your position? Are you easily “led” in a conversation?

 

  • Are you flexible in a conversation? If a comment made by someone takes the conversation in an unexpected direction, can you adjust quickly? Can you assimilate new information, reassess your position, and continue the conversation?

 

 

  • When entering into a conversation, do you attempt to eliminate potential distractions and interruptions?
  • Do you consciously avoid having important conversations in high traffic public areas where environmental distractions are likely possible? Why?
  • Do you put your cell phone in the silence mode when you are likely to have conversations? Why?
  • Do you listen without interruption and sufficiently control the conversation to minimize interruption? Why?
  • When engaged in a conversation, do you give your undivided attention to the matters being discussed? Why?
  • When engaged in discussion, do you develop reflective questions pertinent to the conversation? Why?
  • When engaged in discussion, do you make conscious eye contact? Why?
  • When involved in conversations, are you cognizant of body language, both the individual you are conversing with and your own? Why?
  • Do you have an understanding of body language gestures and posturing?

 

In a self-assessment summary, provide a list of your communication strengths and weaknesses. Also, provide a plan to address the weaknesses identified.

 

See below a template that you can use to complete the assignment.

Support your responses with examples.

Cite any sources in APA format.

Self-assessment of Communication Skills

 

Listening is an integral part of the communication process. Communication in the healthcare setting is vital. This includes communication between doctors and patients, doctors and nurses, clinicians and administrators, and so on.

 

Based on your learning, answer the following questions:

 

  • Which topic of conversation makes you uncomfortable? What is the topic? Do you know why you find it difficult to talk about this topic?

<Enter your response here.>

 

 

 

  • What do you do when you become uncomfortable during a conversation? Do you withdraw? Do you try to change the topic? Do you speak louder or softer? Do you begin to gesticulate?

 

 

 

  • Have you had an occasion to talk to a very persuasive or very aggressive person? If you and this person hold different opinions, can you hold to your position? Are you easily “led” in a conversation?

<Enter your response here.>

 

 

  • Are you flexible in a conversation? If a comment made by someone takes the conversation in an unexpected direction, can you adjust quickly? Can you assimilate new information, reassess your position, and continue the conversation?

 

 

 

  • When entering into a conversation, do you attempt to eliminate potential distractions and interruptions?

 

 

 

 

  • Do you consciously avoid having important conversations in high traffic public areas where environmental distractions are likely possible? Why?
  • Do you put your cell phone in the silence mode when you are likely to have conversations? Why?

 

 

 

  • Do you listen without interruption and sufficiently control the conversation to minimize interruption? Why?