When planning for instruction and assessments, it is crucial to examine performance data in order to modify and adjust instruction and assessments. This not only promotes student progress, but also helps to meet the diverse learning and academic needs of all students.

Because reading and writing skills are crucial for success in all content areas, standardized tests evaluate students reading and writing skills on a regular basis. Review the “Sample Standardized Test Scores within High School Reading/Writing for Informational Text” found in topic materials. Imagine that these are last year’s reading/writing results from your high school for the students currently in your classes.

Based on the student assessment results in topic materials “Sample Standardized Test Scores within High School Reading/Writing for Informational Text”, create a 500-750 word Assessment Analysis Action Plan describing how you will adjust your instruction to close learning gaps. Include in your plan:

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now
  • A state reading or writing standard to integrate with your content area
  • Patterns and gaps in learning identified within the data
  • At least 2-3 supplemental reading/writing resources to integrate into your content area instruction and rationales to explain how they would be utilized
  • Minimum of 2-3 lesson topic ideas with rationales that address the specific gaps in student achievement in reading/writing
  • At least 2-3 assessment ideas to monitor student progress in attaining the content
  • How to provide feedback to students on their progress
  • How to work collaboratively with teachers in other content areas to support them in closing learning gaps

Support your action plan with a minimum of three scholarly resources.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
SEC-516 SEC-516-O500 Data-Based Instruction and Assessment 70.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Supplemental Reading/Writing Resources and Rationale (including standards and noted patterns and gaps in learning) 15.0% Not addressed. The resources are irrelevant and/or rationales are poorly developed. The resources are inconsistent or rationales are vague and could be more thorough. The resources are relevant and rationales are detailed. The resources are insightful and rationales are creative and comprehensive.
Lesson Topic Ideas with Rationales 15.0% Not addressed. Lesson topic ideas are inadequate and/or rationales are ineffectively developed. Lesson topic ideas are weak or rationales are unclear. Lesson topic ideas are logical and rationales are descriptive. Lesson topic ideas are specific and rationales are expertly developed.
Assessment Ideas 15.0% Not addressed. Assessment ideas ineffectively monitor student progress in attaining the content. Assessment ideas insufficiently monitor student progress in attaining the content. Assessment ideas effectively monitor student progress in attaining the content. Assessment ideas proficiently monitor student progress in attaining the content.
Summary of Feedback for Students 15.0% Not addressed. Summary of feedback for students is inadequately developed or incomplete and/or does not address all requirements. Summary of feedback for students is unfocused or vague or does not address all requirements. Summary of feedback for students is logical and complete. Summary of feedback for students is creative and thorough.
Explanation of Collaboration with Colleagues 15.0% Not addressed. Explanation of collaboration with colleagues is unconvincing and/or does not address all requirements. Explanation of collaboration with colleagues is unclear or does not address all requirements. Explanation of collaboration with colleagues is descriptive and completely addresses all requirements. Explanation of collaboration with colleagues is innovative and skillfully addresses all requirements.
Organization 10.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
Research Citations and Format 5.0% Not addressed. Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 10.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Total Weightage 100%
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"