Unit 2: Essay #1: Rhetorical Analysis

Essay #1: Rhetorical Analysis

For Essay #1, please write a summary and analysis of any one of the following two articles from Chapter 14:

Mark Edmundson, “Who Are You and What Are You Doing Here? A Word to the Incoming Class,”  (pp. 405-415).

Laura Pappano, “How Big-Time Sports Ate College Life,” (pp. 416-426).

Your audience is educated peers who have read the article, and are wondering what you think about it.

Your rhetorical analysis must include a summary of what the article argues, and also an analysis and evaluation ofhow well the article makes its points.

Your essay should include those elements of summary that Greene and Lidinsky recommend:

  • the context of the article
  • a clear statement of what you feel to be “the gist” of the article
  • a description of the key claims of the article
  • 1-2 relevant examples (direct quotations or paraphrases) from the article

As no summary is neutral, you must weave an analytical thread throughout your summary that suggests to the reader your judgment of the value of the article. You might consider including:

  • examine how well the article appeals to its intended audience
  • evaluate the author’s use of evidence
  • identify the author’s purpose or motivation for writing
  • point out the gaps and flaws in the article’s argument

Do not attempt to summarize every last detail of the article. Instead, focus on the gist of the article and your analysis of the how well the article supports its points.

Because an analysis is your perspective, it is appropriate to use “I” in this essay. However, do use “I” sparingly — your focus should be on analyzing the article, not on simply stating your own beliefs.

Guidelines for Essay #1

Length/Due Date: approximately 600 words, due Sunday, 3 November.

Style/Format: This, as all essays in EN106, should be formatted in a standard scholarly format. (Most students follow MLA or APA guidelines, which are outlined in Easy Writer.) No matter what format you follow, be sure to do the following:

  • Use 12 point, Times New Roman font, double-spaced.
  • Use 1-inch margins top, bottom, and sides.
  • Although no cover page is needed, you should include your name, my name, the course number/title, and date at the upper left-hand corner of the manuscript.

References: Essay #1 must quote or paraphrase the article you are analyzing. Each time you quote or paraphrase the article, include in-text citations that follow MLA or APA style.

File format: Please submit your essay as a .doc or .docx file. These formats are available in most word processors, including Google Docs and Open Office, and will ensure that your instructor is able to comment on your work.

Works Cited/References: Create an appropriate bibliography, with one entry for the article you are analyzing. Use Easy Writer to learn how to format a end-of-text citation for a work in an anthology or selection in a book with an editor.

Titles: Include a descriptive title at the beginning of your essay that tips your readers off to your central message. Do not format your title with quotation marks, boldface, underlining or italics. Quotation marks or underlining are only appropriate if the title borrows words from another source.

Deadline: Submit your final draft essay no later than Midnight on Sunday at the end of this unit.

Use of essays for future courses: Please understand that your essay may be used— anonymously—as a sample for future EN106 students and instructors unless you expressly request that it not be used. Your work, of  course, will only be used for educational purposes.

Assessment: See the Grading and Assessment content item under Course Home to see the criteria and rubric I will use to grade your essay.

Why Is This Assignment Important?

A very common type of writing you will produce in your academic career is a source analysis. The ability to engage in close reading of a text, identify salient arguments and evidence, present the text’s ideas in your own words, and evaluate that source’s effectiveness is foundational to entering academic conversations. Summaries also serve an important role in helping other readers make sense of a difficult text. You might think of analysis as the job of a tour guide: you are offering your readers a brief glimpse into another world.

As you learned from Greene and Lidinsky’s chapter, writing a rhetorical analysis involves a great deal of critical thinking and evaluation on the part of the writer. You must identify the author’s thesis (what Greene and Lidinsky call “the gist”), uncover how the key claims of that thesis are supported and developed, evaluate the conversational contexts of the author’s work, and, at all points, consider how your perspective affects your interpretation of the text.

A Word about Plagiarism

Rhetorical analysis is a common type of writing assignments in first-year writing courses. Because of this, you can find countless Internet sites, free and proprietary summaries, and term papers that respond to assignments similar to this one. Any undocumented use of another writer’s words or ideas constitutes plagiarism and is a violation of Park’s Student Conduct CodeLinks to an external site.. Plagiarism may result in failure of the assignment. Multiple instances of plagiarism may result in automatic failure of the course or other penalties outside of this course.

If you have questions about plagiarism, contact your instructor.

The Body Rituals Of The Nacirema

https://www.sfu.ca/~palys/Miner-1956-BodyRitualAmongTheNacirema.pdf

Read the article and answer the following questions in paragraph format:

1) Some would say that Miner’s analysis exoticizes the Nacirema and makes them seem mysterious and irrational. What in his writing dose this? Does presenting customs as “religion” rather that as “science” or “medicine” inevitably make them seem irrational to people in our own culture? Are our own customs with respect to care of the body irrational? In what ways is scientific medicine different from other (“religious”) belief systems? How much of what human beings do in everyday life is “rational” or “irrational”?

2) Contemporary anthropologists are concerned about “the problem of representation.” They are concerned about who gets to “represent” a group of people, by writing about them, documenting, filming, and interpreting their behavior. What are the ethical/moral implications of speaking “for” or representing a group of people from a different culture that is not your own? For example, can an outsider represent your culture and should they have the right to speak about it “scientifically” or “anthropologically”? How might their story be distorted?

3) When did you get the joke? Who are the “Nacirema” and what point is the author making?

Discussion 2 – Statistical Formulas

This week, we cover the central tendency, which includes mean, median and mode.  Choose a scenario below, or one that better fits your career path:

•As the accountant, you are asked to provide data on salaries for the staff members (from receptionist to CEO).  Would the mean salary be the best representation of this data, please explain?

•As an IT call center representative, you are asked to analyze data from the past 6 months calls and technical issues that were reported.  As you analyze, you look at the mode, would this be the best central tendency analysis to provide to your supervisor listing the top 3 technical issues, please explain?

•As a medical facilitator, you are asked to analyze data from the past years patient visits.  As you analyze, you look at the median wait time before seen by a physician.  Would the median be the best representation of the wait time, please explain?

•As a graphic designer, you are asked to provide data on the software that has been used in projects over the last 6 months.  The company is about to upgrade, but has a limited budget, but wants to upgrade the software used more frequently.  As you analyze, you look at the mode, would this be the best central tendency analysis to provide to the owner, please explain?

Safety And Health In Engineering Technologies Assignment 2

Purdue University Calumet

College of Technology

Department of Construction Science and Organizational Leadership

Organizational Leadership and Supervision (OLS)

 

OLS 30000: Safety and Health in Engineering Technologies

 

Assignment 2 – Mil-Tech – Ethics in Safety

This assignment has two parts: Part 1: Your responses to two questions and Part 2: One page report.

Missing ANY component will lead to “0” point for an entire assignment. Therefore, please read instructions carefully.

PART 1:

TASK: Read “Mil-Tech” case study found in your textbook within the ethic chapter. Upon completion of reading, each student is to submit a paper answering the following questions in a CONSTRUCTIVE manner.

QUESTION 1)  Discuss what it is you think might happen with each of the following actions that Garcia attempts. (Provide your response in a paragraph format for each action):

1) Garcia goes to his boss and explains that he has become aware of the company’s intentions to use the more toxic paint. He expresses his concerns on three points (a) the potential impact on exposed employees; (b) the potential liability beyond Workers’ Comp and; (c) the fact that he was not included in the discussions about this material.  (Be sure to support your thoughts.)

2) Garcia gets rebuffed when he takes this information to his boss, so he decides to go to the union and tip them off as to the company’s plans. (Be sure to support your thoughts.)

3) Garcia decides to go to OSHA and inform them of the company’s intentions to use the more toxic paint without properly training the employees and informing them of the potential hazards. (Be sure to support your thoughts.)

QUESTIONS 2) If you were Garcia, what would you do or what kind of approach would you take? Be sure to apply information you obtain from the lecture/textbook to support your approach. In other words, describe HOW and WHY you would approach as you indicated in your document.

 

 

 

PART 2:

Based on our lecture, each student will need to prepare one page report of what you have done/identified under Part 1 above. First, select a type of one page report (Refer to One Page Report lecture). Second develop one page report.

 

SUBMISSION of Part 1 and Part 2: Once you complete both Part 1 and Part 2, please submit both documents as one document (See below) through appropriate assignment link (Where you obtain this instruction) in the Blackboard as an attachment.

 

One Document. Each student should have two document (Part 1 and Part 2). When you ATTACH your document (or submit through the Blackboard), please combine them as one document. If Part 2 is in horizontal format, you must learn how to make Part 1 being vertical and Part 2 being horizontal.(You can do so using Page Break function within MS Word.)

 

NOTES:

·         Make sure your document has proper file name.

·         Sending your assignment as an email attachment is NOT accepted.

·         Not following the format will lead to 0.

·         Not including requested item(s) will lead to 0.

·         Going “Above and Beyond” such as including additional relevant information will lead to extra credit(s).

 

If you have any question, please feel free to contact your instructor.

1/15/2015

1

Ethics in Environmental Health and Safety

OLS 30000: Safety and Health in Engineering Technologies Shoji Nakayama, Ph.D.

Revised 01/05/15

What are ethics?  The application of morality within a context

established by cultural and professional values, social norms, and accepted standards of behavior.

 Ethical questions are rarely black and white, but typically fall into a gray area.

Ethics Defined

 The concept of ethics means:  “…written and unwritten codes of principles and

values that govern decisions and actions within a company.”

 Workplace ethical dilemmas are more complex than ethical situations in general.

Ethics Defined (Cont.) Ethics in U.S.

 For the most part, industry in the U.S. operates in the scope of accepted legal & ethical standards.

 Be aware of the ethical dilemmas and know how to deal with such issues.

 Employee decisions to behave ethically or not are influenced by many individual & situational factors.

 

 

1/15/2015

2

Example – Software Misuse

You are browsing the internet and see some software that may be useful in your job. Do you download the software to your PC at work and start to use it in your job?

POTENTIAL ANSWERS:  Check the company’s Internet Policy to see if this software falls within

a category that is permitted to be downloaded.  Download the software and use it.  Download the software at home, and bring it to work.  Never use software off the internet. .  Never turn down a freebie.

 Social factors influence ethical behavior:  Gender,  Role differences,  Religion,  Age,  Work experience,  Nationality,  Influence of other people who are significant

in an individual’s life.

Ethical Behavior in Organizations

Creating an Ethical Environment

A company that promotes, expects, and rewards ethical behavior can answer “yes” to these questions:

 Do employees have the right of due process?  Do employees have access to an objective grievance

procedure?  Are there appropriate safety & health measures to

protect employees?  Are hiring practices fair and impartial?  Are promotion practices fair and objective?  Are employees protected from harassment based

on race, gender, or other reasons?

Example – Falsifying Records

Your coworker A recently announced that he has completed his academic requirements for his MBA. This achievement makes him eligible for advancement at your company. Due to the location of your work areas, you overhear a conversation where he indicates that a falsified transcript and diploma was all it took to fool his bosses and coworkers. What do you do?

POTENTIAL ANSWERS:  Confront the coworker with your knowledge and tell him he should

correct the record.  Notify your Human Resources department anonymously so your

coworker won’t know you reported him.  Discuss the situation with your manager.  Keep it to yourself-he’s doing a good job.  Inform personnel that you need to update your education profile.

 

 

1/15/2015

3

Example – Work Environment and Solicitation

The company has a policy against solicitation and posting of notices. However, you are aware that others do occasionally sell things at work. This week, the administrative assistant for the vice president of your group is selling candy to raise money for her kids’ school project, and she has the candy on the counter with a sign asking people to buy. What do you do?

POTENTIAL ANSWERS:  Nothing. Since no one is being forced, its an individual choice.  Ask her if she is aware of the nonsolicitation policy, and politely explain what it is and what you have been told about it.

 Do not buy the candy, and quietly discourage others from buying any.  Discuss it with your Human Resources representative to determine what to do.

 Fat the candy, then explain the company policy.

Role of Professionals

 National Society of Professional Engineers Code of Ethics:  Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health and

welfare of the public in the performance of their professional duties. Code of Ethics

 American Society of Civil Engineers Code of Ethics:  Engineers shall recognize that the lives, safety, health

and welfare of the general public are dependent upon engineering decisions ….

Role of Professionals (Cont.)

 American Society of Safety Engineers Code of Ethics:  Duty to serve and protect people, property and

environment.  Exercise duty with integrity, honor and dignity.

 Board of Certified Safety Professionals Code of Ethics:  “Certificants shall, in their professional safety activities,

sustain and advance the integrity, honor, and prestige of the safety profession by adherence to these standards.”

Role of Safety Professionals

 We represent a significant role –

 Deciding what is ethical is easier than actually doing what is ethical.  of ethical behavior.  the right decision

when facing ethical questions.  Helping employees follow through and

actually undertake the ethical option.

 

 

1/15/2015

4

Legal vs Ethics

The concepts of legal and ethics are not the same thing—just because an option is legal does not necessarily mean it is ethical.

 Illegal = Unethical  Legal = Ethical

There are some legal but unethical standards, etc. A person’s behavior can be well within the scope of the law and still be unethical.

Examples – Legal but ?  Sell a packaged safety program – may not work  Sell a safety system that has not been correlated to

actual results.  Not inform executives of their liability under current civil

and criminal law  Force company to implement safety system that have

been proven effective  Not staying current – even though our code addresses

this  Disregard input of those in the organization – employees

who know both the problem and the answers.  Incentive program  Company have published data that do not include

incidents that other include (CTDs, back strains, etc)

 Apply the morning-after test.  Apply the front-page test.  Apply the mirror test.  Apply the role-reversal test.  Apply the commonsense test.

Guidelines for Determining Ethical Behavior (Cont.)

A four-question test to determine if a given decision is ethical:

1. Is the 2. Is the decision 3. Will the decision generate goodwill for my

organization? 4. Is the decision beneficial to all stakeholders?

Guidelines for Determining Ethical Behavior (Cont.)

 

 

1/15/2015

5

Approaches to Ethical Dilemma

Three approaches to the role of the safety and health

professional.

Company’s Role in Ethics

A company creates an ethical environment by establishing policies and practices that ensure

all employees are treated ethically and then enforcing these policies.

Employees must be able to trust their company to conduct all external and internal dealings in

an ethical manner.

Setting an Ethical Example

 In addition to an ethical internal environment, and handling external dealings in an ethical manner, companies must support safety & health professionals who make ethically correct decisions.  Not just when such decisions are profitable, but in all

cases.

Handling of Ethical Dilemmas

 How, when, should you proceed when confronting an ethical dilemma?  Apply the various guidelines for determining what

is ethical.  Select one of the three basic approaches to handling

ethical questions.  Proceed in accordance with the approach selected,

and proceed with consistency.

 

 

1/15/2015

6

Questions to Ask When Making Decisions

 Has the problem been thoroughly, accurately defined?  Would other stakeholders (employees, customers) agree

with your definition of the problem?  What is your real motivation in making this decision?  What is the probable short-term result of your decision  Who will be affected by your decision and in what way?  Did you discuss the decision with all stakeholders (or all

possible stakeholders) before making it?  Would your decision withstand the scrutiny of employees,

customers, colleagues, and the general public?

Language of Ethical Lapses

 “ Everybody else does it!”  “ If we don’t do it, Someone else will!”  “ That’s the way it has always been done!”  “ We’ll wait until the lawyers tell us it’s wrong!”  “ It doesn’t really hurt anyone!”  “ The system is unfair!”  “ I was just following orders!”

Quote

 “Nothing is more powerful for employees than seeing their managers behave according to their expressed values and standards; nothing is more devastating to the development of an ethical environment than a manager who violates the organization’s ethical standards.”

Dan Rice and Craig Dreilinger: Management. Consultants

Whistle-blowing

What can safety & health professionals do when their employer is violating legal or ethical standards?

 What about those occasions when the safety & health professional is ignored or, worse yet, told to “mind your own business”?

Whistle-blowing: It’s an act of informing outside authority of alleged illegal or unethical acts on the part of an organization or individual.

 

 

1/15/2015

7

Problems with Whistle-Blowing

 American society has an interesting attitude:  Even when the illegal or unethical practice in question

threatens the safety & health of employees, some people still don’t like whistle-blowers.

 Retribution.  Damaged relationships and hostility.  Loss of focus.  Scapegoating.

OSHA and Whistle-Blowing

 Illegal to discharge/discriminate employee 

 http://www.whistleblowers.gov  One more reason safety & health professionals

should encourage their employers to develop comprehensive safety & health policies.