rhetorical analysis and evaluation

/in /by

this Assignment is related to the one you wrote for me before

In all research, we must guard against the fallacy of the false dilemma, also known as the either/or fallacy. Despite the way in which controversies are portrayed by many media outlets, most issues of consequence have more than two sides, so if we oversimplify an issue into only two sides, we are guilty of fallacious reasoning. Some issues, however, have one side, such as whether the Holocaust happened or whether humans walked on the moon, and anyone who does not accept that fact of history is intentionally engaging in false narratives.

For this assignment, you will write an essay providing your readers with a broad understanding of the debate over a topic. You will need to research a wide variety of sources that relate directly to the topic and find the similarities and the differences among those sources in terms of the points at issue in the debate. Instead of a direct argument about one side of the topic, your essay should present a more far-reaching perspective, examining many sides and branching out into related issues that help shed light on the topic. You should, of course, refrain from perpetuating false narratives and examine beliefs that are well-documented and grounded in some form of verifiable fact.

A successful response to this assignment requires you to apply the same scrutiny to your sources for this assignment that you applied to the article for your A2 rhetorical analysis. You know that the article represents an author’s viewpoint, so you treated that text as one voice, not “truth.” Thinking of a text as an author’s voice it easier when it is blatantly an opinion piece, but we often don’t think of other texts that way. In reality, all texts represent an author’s voice and viewpoints. Even sources that sound like they are reporting objective facts are often really reporting the author’s interpretation of the facts

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post rhetorical analysis and evaluation appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.

Memorandum | Management homework help

/in /by

 

Topic: How does a group create new knowledge and share it to improve its effectiveness?

Fredrick Helmut is an ambitious design engineer working in the London Division of GDD. Fredrick Helmut has a PhD in Aero-Space engineering from Emory University. He recently moved back from the London branch to work in the US division headquarters,. He made the move to promote his career.

It was known that the current team leader in Chicago would be retiring at the end of the year and the company was looking for a successor.  Frederick Helmut wanted his job. The Chicago team was working on a different design approach to developing a Plane that would maximize the use of cargo space holding smaller packages only..

During his time in London Frederick Helmut discovered a potential design for larger cargo that could result in double the number of packages held in the cargo hold. This potential idea is one that Fredrick Helmut has contained in his notes and would like to pursue.

However, he wonders if this is something that could be used to benefit his career. He would like to pursue the idea individually but is not sure that this would be encouraged in his new job.  Upon return to the United States, Frederick Helmut discovered that this design would in fact secure a great promotion.

Joanna Bockman, the current team leader, reviewed Frederick Helmut’s notes upon his arrival to the team to understand the level and type of work he was doing in London. When she saw the discovery note she questioned Frederick Helmut further.

He hedged on his answers because he was not sure whether he wanted to discuss his findings quite yet. Joanna Bockman assured him that the company would never take any credit from him if the design were useful, but Frederick Helmut remained tentative (was not so sure). His colleagues suggest that a new design is not always welcome. In fact, his colleagues in London agreed. Joanna Bockman was sure the information would be useful but decided to wait for Frederick Helmut to change his mind about reporting the design.

Joanna Bockman received an email message several weeks later from Mr. Rockfish (CEO) saying that they had lost a contract with a new company because they could not price competitively for the number of large packages in the cargo hold. Could she and the others come up with a design?

Joanna Bockman was quite unhappy with the news and wondered if Frederick Helmut was deliberately placing obstacles in the company’s success to get ahead or could the rumors be true that people were not willing to share new ideas because they thought the company was not willing to learn or work with them. Joanna Bockman was determined to resolve the problem, so she sought out Frederick Helmut and asked him to reconsider his position. He said he would think about it and get back to her shortly. Joanna Bockman thought she would follow it up in writing so he could see how important it was to reconsider his earlier decision. Sharing information was critical to company’s success.

Directions: 

1. By WEDNESDAY, complete the following:

  • Assuming you were Joanna Bockman, draft a memorandum to Frederick Helmut explaining the current situation.
  • Articulate the importance of sharing organizational knowledge.
  • Why is the sharing of information important to a company?
  • Discuss the relationship between knowledge management and competitive advantage.
  • The benefits to Frederick Helmut in sharing the information (individual tacit knowledge).
  • Decide whether to include a recommendation regarding possible incentives or motivation to encourage Fredrick Helmut to share his information.
  • If you do decide to make such a recommendation, specify the incentives or motivation you would like to offer Frederick Helmut.
  • Is the fact that Frederick Helmut listened to his colleagues from London and Chicago the influence of communities of practice? Should Joanna Bockman comment about this to Frederick Helmut?
  • You must use course material to support your responses and APA in-text citations with a reference list. 

2. THROUGHOUT the week, complete the following:

  • Respond to your classmates four or more days throughout the week.
  • Discuss with each other the best arguments to present in this memo and how to present them. 
  • You must use course material to support your responses. 

 https://www.knowledge-management-tools.net/organizational-learning.html 

cultural communication values and intercultural communication challenges paper rough draft

/in /by

Select a culture to research throughout the semester.
This first paper will analyze what you find out about the culture 1) from depictions of the cultural group in U.S. media and 2) from academic journals or scholarly references explaining the communication/values of the cultural group.
Write 1,000-1,250 words in response to the following:

Compare and contrast the concepts of stereotyping and ethnocentrism.
Find two concrete examples that show how the cultural group you are studying is stereotypically represented by local and/or national media in the U.S. (This could include Comic Strips, Newspaper Articles, Advertisements, TV Shows, etc.).
Compare and contrast these media stereotypes with research about the culture communication value orientations (pick two value dimensions from the list provided below, describe the value dimension, explain what research findings say about your culture in relation to these values, and give illustrations of how this is expressed in their communication).

High vs. low-context
High vs. low power-distance
Individualism vs. collectivism
High vs. low uncertainty avoidance
Polychronic vs. monochronic
Femininity vs. masculinity
Long-term vs. short-term
Indulgence vs. restraint

Using academic sources, explain how mass-mediated stereotypes may affect communication between you and a member of this cultural group.

You will turn this paper into 2 places by the deadline (Day 7): 1) submit it into the assignment dropbox, and 2) post it into the MAIN FORUM under the folder your instructor sets up. (Your final draft of this assignment will be due by Day 7 of Topic 3.)
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
COM263_T3_Benchmark Research Project Part 1.docx
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Related

Advance 1 | Marketing homework help

/in /by

Instructions

Case studies are an important learning strategy in business classes as they provide an opportunity for you to critically analyze events that have taken place in real-life businesses. This develops your critical thinking and research skills as you research the competition and industry in which your business resides with an end goal of formulating a recommendation for the challenges faced by the company. 

Select one of the three case studies listed below, which can be found in your textbook. Evaluate the case of your choice, and respond to each of the questions below using both theory and practical managerial thinking as well as supporting research. 

Option 1: Nike (pp. 30–31)

  1. How has the industry in which Nike resides been doing over the last 5 years? 
  2. What are the pros, cons, and risks associated with Nike’s core marketing strategy? How have they managed to develop a strong customer relationship with their target market? 
  3. Who are the top three competitors of Nike, and what are their advantages/disadvantages with respect to their product/service development? 
  4. Looking at the competitors you discussed in question #3, what would you recommend as being the next steps for these competitors and, subsequently, the next steps for Nike to combat these competitors? 

Option 2: Cisco (pp. 58–59)

  1. How is building a brand in a business-to-business (B2B) context different than that of a business-to-consumer (B2C) market? How has Cisco managed to develop a strong customer relationship with their target market? 
  2. How has the industry in which Cisco resides been doing over the last 5 years? 
  3. Who are the top three competitors of Cisco, and what are their advantages/disadvantages with respect to their product/service development? 
  4. Is Cisco’s plan to reach out to consumers a viable one? Why, or why not? As a marketing manager for Cisco, what would you recommend to be the next steps? 

Option 3: Intel (pp. 59–60)

  1. Discuss how Intel changed ingredient-marketing history. What did it do so well in those initial marketing campaigns? How did Intel manage to develop a strong customer relationship with their target market? 
  2. How has the industry in which Intel resides been doing over the last 5 years? 
  3. Who are the top three competitors of Intel, and what are their advantages/disadvantages with respect to their product/service development? 
  4. Evaluate Intel’s greatest risks and strengths as the industry moves out of the personal computer (PC) era. Identify the next steps that Intel needs to employ in order to maintain its competitive advantage. 

In formatting your case analysis, do not use the question-and-answer format; instead, use an essay format with subheadings. Your APA-formatted case study should be a minimum of 500 words in length (not counting the title and reference pages). You are required to use a minimum of three peer-reviewed, academic sources that are no more than 5 years old (one may be your textbook). All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased material must have accompanying in-text citations.