QEP Assignment 3: Answer the following: The laws and regulations that govern aviation, immigration, and international trade have become key parts of the national security apparatus.

Answer the following: The laws and regulations that govern aviation, immigration, and international trade have become key parts of the national security apparatus. Debates over no-fly lists, border security, and the protection of airplane technology now take place alongside those over the militarys rules of engagement or the value of NSA programs. Why?  Please use academic resources to support your position.

Requirements:

Please double space your paper and use Times New Roman 12-point font.
APA format.  Please utilize appropriate citations and references for sources.  A minimum of three (5) academic sources is required.
Please include your word count at the end of your assignment.

In the Little Book of Race and Restorative Justice, the author, Fania E. Davis,

In the Little Book of Race and Restorative Justice, the author, Fania E. Davis, takes the position that principles of restorative justice should be in the forefront, and the center, of racial reconciliation in the United States. She believes that it is the only way to heal the nation.

Select an incident of racial injustice that has occurred in the United States, i.e. Ferguson police shooting, Trayvon Martin, Starbucks ejecting black men, and apply one of the restorative justice models you learned about this semester. These models include, mediation, circles, conferencing, impact panels, truth and reconciliation hearings.

Walk me through the application of Inclusion, Encounter, Amends and Reintegration from Chapters 4-7 in the textbook, Restoring Justice.

1. Explain the incident of racial injustice. This can include an incident from the current news cycle, historical event or cancel culture. For example, Amy Cooper from Central Park who called the police on the African American man bird watcher.
 

2. Which model would you use? What are the elements? For example, in the aforementioned, Central Park incident you may use the Victim Offender model.

3. Then you would discuss, inclusion who should be there? What do you think they might say? What might be discussed? Tell me and explain it.

4. Could there be Amends?

5. How does the person or entity Reintegrate? Should it be allowed?
Please go back to the chapters for guidance on these points

6. What is the expected outcome? Using Daviss book, think about possible outcomes such as, national truth telling, restitution, reparations, public apologies.

This paper is now only 3 pages!! If you go over, no more than 5 pages. If you submit 2 pages, you will receive a 0 on the assignment. It must be 3 full pages or no grade.

ANSWER ONLY ONE of the following four questions.

ANSWER ONLY ONE of the following four questions.

2-3 pages. Due Monday November 30

Use the assigned readings.

Ashby, LeRoy

2012      With Amusement for All: A History of American Popular Culture since 1830 Lexington: University of Kentucky Press

1) Who was PT Barnum? What innovations in entertainment and popular culture did he create? Do we see his ideas in popular culture today?

(NOTE: The wrong answer is the circus still exists)

2)How did popular culture at the turn of the 19th to 20th century help create/inform/construct the middle-class? And/or middle class behaviors?

(NOTE: The point is to use chapters 5 and/or 6)

3)How was popular culture affected by the 1930s depression? In what ways was popular culture important to the American people at the time?

(Note: Chapter 7)

4) How was popular culture used to create a consensus among the American people? (for WWii, for 1940s/60s society) How was this consensus challenged?

(Note: Chapter 8 and/or9)

We are not thinking what we are doing when we allow the unregulated spread of information on social media platforms.

Write an argumentative research paper in which you identify an example of failing to “think what we are doing” in 2020. Indicate the specific ways in which your chosen topic poses potential dangers and illustrate with evidence from your research. Consider counterargument along the way, acknowledging why some people don’t recognize the dangers you are pointing to. Finally, indicate a way forward: what do you think we should do about this issue?

Need to use at lease 3 sources that I attached.
Please see word documents for more details